Choosing an automated finishing system that best suits a facility’s specific painting needs can be challenging. However, IntelliFinishing has created a logic-based flowchart that uses easy-to-answer questions to help determine whether a simple monorail system, a power & free system (P&F), or a friction tube conveyor system (such as is offered by IntelliFinishing) aligns with an operation’s respective part types and paint processes.
When Simple Questions Provide Quick Decision-Making
With simple questions such as “Do you need to powder-coat parts, liquid paint parts, or both?”, and “Will your finished parts be relatively inexpensive, or do you want to spend as little as possible on a system?”, stakeholders can use IntelliFinishing’s flowchart as a decision-making tool that rapidly assesses their actual requirements to ascertain which type of finishing system pairs to their business’ needs.
When Cost Matters and Adaptability Isn’t a Must
In situations where total system cost is the most important consideration, a traditional system, like a monorail or simple power & free system, may be entirely adequate. This is especially true when processing similar parts that use the same exact finishing recipe. And while not exceptionally adaptable, chain-based systems have proven themselves to be extremely durable and reasonably reliable. A ballpark estimate of monorail uptime standards are about 80%. Costs for monorails range from a few hundred thousand for smaller systems to multi-millions for very large systems. Despite this, there is no question that a monorail system will typically be the least costly automated system available due to its sheer simplicity and availability.
When Flexibility is Necessary
On the other hand, P&F and IntelliFinishing systems offer a much wider degree of system flexibility, but at increased costs. Much like monorails, P&F and IntelliFinishing systems include pre-finishing steps like blast, wash, dry-off, and masking, and post-finish steps like curing and cool down but both can increase the ability to process a wider variety of parts concurrently on the same system. P&F systems allow parts to drop off the chain to stop for processes or to move from one chain process to another through multiple chains and chain drives. IntelliFinishing systems also allow parts to stop as needed or to move on track spurs to and through optional processes. Either system can accommodate many recipe options including up to providing both powder and liquid finishes on the same system. However, an IntelliFinishing System provides many more movement options that chain systems can’t match such as the ability to speed up or slow down as well as the ability to move in reverse.
When a Customizable System Must be a Part of the Solution
For finishing processes that require a high degree of customization per part or the ability to adapt as process needs change, an IntelliFinishing provides a flexible and far from traditional solution. Using a friction-driven tube conveyor that can speed up, stop, and reverse direction eliminates the chain common on monorail and P&F systems. And no chain means that changes in one area—for example, in cure time, load time, or paint time—has little to no effect on any other processes occurring simultaneously! Plus, the dirt- and dust-collecting chains that require messy lubricants, drag heat from ovens throughout the facility, and are typically very noisy are eliminated. This translates into a higher quality finish with less rework; savings on oven heating costs; and a more comfortable work environment for operators. Depending on the complexity of the P&F system, they are often as or even more expensive than an IntelliFinishing system, but they are unable to provide near the extent of flexibility available with an IntelliFinishing system.
IntelliFinishing’s use of shuttles, spurs, and deadhead turns allows for tighter use of floor space, especially for longer parts. Some clients report up to a 43% reduction in floorspace compared to same function P&F systems. Meanwhile, due to smart sensor technology, both the conveyor and most process equipment only run when the parts are present. This reduces electrical, heating, and water waste, saving costs while improving processing throughput.
When Functionality is Important and Downtime Is Not an Option
The modular design of an IntelliFinishing system also creates an easily expandable floor plan. Using modular process equipment bolted together in an easily modifiable support structure, IntelliFinishing systems offer superior functionality when compared to traditional welded-together chain systems. IntelliFinishing systems as well as changes to the system can typically be installed in a fraction of the time as alternative systems. Components and modules are typically constructed off-site and delivered ready to bolt together, reducing total onsite install time while allowing businesses to begin or change operations as quickly as possible with much less installation-related downtime.
When Control and Analytics Count
With an IntelliFinishing System, not only can manufacturers easily customize and control recipe configurations for each step of the finishing process, the system also automatically provides reporting and the ability to integrate with other database systems including most ERP systems. Recipe control, ERP integrations, and analytic data are typically not included or only rudimentarily available with most traditional chain-based systems.
Automated Finishing System Infographic
Facilities looking to add, upgrade, or replace their finishing system can use IntelliFinishing’s Automated Finishing System Infographic to determine whether an IntelliFinishing system or one of the chain-based systems best suits their finishing applications.
For more information, click here to see videos of installed systems or here to see an overview video of the benefits of an IntelliFinishing System.
To speak with a representative, call 785-309-0356 or simply fill out the Contact Us form on the IntelliFinishing website.
Related posts
Search this blog
Get email updates
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- August 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- September 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- August 2013
- July 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010